chaotic_nipple (
chaotic_nipple) wrote2007-04-26 05:08 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Todd Goldman is still an Art "Thief"*.
Cross-posted to
legos
"Oh, what a cool picture!"

"I think I will draw the exact same one and put my name on it!"

For an explanation, go here, and for vast amounts of other meme-sheep art, check out the links here. Hmm, people may think the term "Meme-sheep" is insulting. How about "Meme-slut" instead? ;-)
*Why did I put the word "thief" in quotes, you ask? Simple: I don't believe that so-called "intellectual property" has the same moral status that real property does. "But artists deserve to be paid for their work!" you say? You're right, they do, but so do cab driver, and no one would claim that a customer who cheated a cabbie out of his fare was "stealing" a ride the same way that a shoplifter steals physical goods. Both are equally wrong and damaging to the victim, both deserve equal punishment, but they are _not_ the same.
Personally, I think we would be much better off thinking of art, software, etc. as "Intellectual services" instead. Much less cognitive dissonance involved.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
"Oh, what a cool picture!"

"I think I will draw the exact same one and put my name on it!"

For an explanation, go here, and for vast amounts of other meme-sheep art, check out the links here. Hmm, people may think the term "Meme-sheep" is insulting. How about "Meme-slut" instead? ;-)
*Why did I put the word "thief" in quotes, you ask? Simple: I don't believe that so-called "intellectual property" has the same moral status that real property does. "But artists deserve to be paid for their work!" you say? You're right, they do, but so do cab driver, and no one would claim that a customer who cheated a cabbie out of his fare was "stealing" a ride the same way that a shoplifter steals physical goods. Both are equally wrong and damaging to the victim, both deserve equal punishment, but they are _not_ the same.
Personally, I think we would be much better off thinking of art, software, etc. as "Intellectual services" instead. Much less cognitive dissonance involved.
no subject
And if someone steals my art, or my photographs, then yes, they are stealing, because if I cannot use that product, they have taken it from me. They have taken my ability to produce that image and use it in my business, regardless of whether I can prove it's stolen or not. Whether they take the physical image or not, if they take an image that is recognizably mine, and slap their name on it, they're a thief.
no subject
no subject
no subject
You should totally submit the link for this to BoingBoing.
*Subliminal device... we've got other work to do. Let's go.*
The decision of who owns "Intellectual Property"..