chaotic_nipple: (Default)
[personal profile] chaotic_nipple
Forwarded from [livejournal.com profile] schrathe:

Iran to hang teenage girl attacked by rapists.

"Tehran, Iran, Jan. 07 – An Iranian court has sentenced a teenage rape victim to death by hanging after she weepingly confessed that she had unintentionally killed a man who had tried to rape both her and her niece.

The state-run daily Etemaad reported on Saturday that 18-year-old Nazanin confessed to stabbing one of three men who had attacked the pair along with their boyfriends while they were spending some time in a park west of the Iranian capital in March 2005.

Nazanin, who was 17 years old at the time of the incident, said that after the three men started to throw stones at them, the two girls’ boyfriends quickly escaped on their motorbikes leaving the pair helpless.

She described how the three men pushed her and her 16-year-old niece Somayeh onto the ground and tried to rape them, and said that she took out a knife from her pocket and stabbed one of the men in the hand.

As the girls tried to escape, the men once again attacked them, and at this point, Nazanin said, she stabbed one of the men in the chest. The teenage girl, however, broke down in tears in court as she explained that she had no intention of killing the man but was merely defending herself and her younger niece from rape, the report said.

The court, however, issued on Tuesday a sentence for Nazanin to be hanged to death."

Someone explain to me again how Western Culture is supposed to be so sexist and evil?

Clarification to snarky comment: No, I don't think that Western Culture is perfect. It has a wide variety of problems that will take lifetimes to fix. I maintain that we have come farther towards the goal of universal equality than any other contemporary (or most historical) society, and claiming that we're "just as bad", or worse, than the rest of the world, is counterproductive, and only serves to alienate or discourage people whao want to make our society better than it already is. Also, it encourages run-on sentences.

Note: It would be most appreciated if everyone were to make at least a token effort towards civil discussion, and _not_ immediately assume that disagreement and/or criticism is tantamount to a personal attack. Thank you.

Funny, both of the flame wars that have taken place on my blog were instigated by the same person. What are the odds?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-30 07:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] qp4.livejournal.com
You know I think you're blinded by your own ideology (sp?) and/or stubbornly refuse to even look in the direction of the point that this guy has been saying. It's not just about women lady.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-30 02:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ginmar.livejournal.com
Let's see, how about you put aside the ad hom, asshole, and put aside your own ideology of blindly supporting another guy? Not to mention the arrogance of some twenty something tellling a woman how she has to percieve what men say about her existance.

Asshole. Guys like you are the reason I'm a feminist. "God, you're just refusing to look at things the way we ant you to! When we're talking about rape, it's not about women!" Yeah, fuck off.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-31 06:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chaotic-nipple.livejournal.com
This is about the point where you start threatening to ban people.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-31 06:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ginmar.livejournal.com
Wow, that's really stupid. Here you have a guy who uses a great many recognized anti-woman cliches and you can't see the difference between that and someone getting pissed off at that kind of sexism. Good job.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-02-02 10:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chaotic-nipple.livejournal.com
I was merely pointing out that for someone who complains so loudly when people ignore your rules in your livejournal, you have a remarkable ability to disregard other people's wishes regarding what constitutes acceptable behavior on theirs; Specifically, no cussin' and no personal insults. If you really feel that that 'blinded by ideology' is a personal insult rather than a statement of opinion, too bad. 'My blog, my rules'; sound familiar?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-31 06:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chaotic-nipple.livejournal.com
For the record, this is within the bounds of what I would consider acceptable for 'polite' debate, but just _barely_. No name-calling or gratuitous slurs on character or mental stability, but no effort to be considerate either. Let this be the benchmark which all other snark is measured against!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-31 08:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] qp4.livejournal.com
Thank you. *bows*

Profile

chaotic_nipple: (Default)
chaotic_nipple

February 2013

S M T W T F S
      12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags